How Profitable Pickleball Entertainment Venues Are Built: Lessons from Crushyard’s Expansion Strategy

The Biggest Lesson: Foot Traffic Beats Destination Real Estate

One of the most interesting insights from the conversation was Crushyard’s shift in real estate strategy.

Like many entertainment concepts, the early assumption was that pickleball players would travel anywhere for courts. The thinking was simple: find cheaper real estate outside major retail corridors and let the destination nature of the activity drive traffic. But reality proved more complicated.

According to De La Torre, Crushyard discovered that high-foot-traffic retail environments consistently outperformed isolated destination locations. Instead of building far outside city centers, the company began targeting former big box retail stores and highly trafficked shopping plazas — locations where guests were already spending time.

That shift dramatically improved customer acquisition efficiency and reduced reliance on expensive marketing campaigns. For operators in entertainment hospitality, this matters enormously. Whether you operate pickleball, bowling, mini golf, axe throwing, immersive gaming, or another social entertainment concept, the economics of visibility and convenience often outweigh marginal savings on rent. The best entertainment venue POS system or service model cannot fully compensate for poor location strategy.

Food and Beverage Is the Real Growth Engine

One of the strongest themes throughout the conversation was the role food and beverage plays in profitability. “The courts fill themselves up,” De La Torre explained. That statement highlights something many operators underestimate: activity revenue often has a natural ceiling. Once courts, bays, or lanes reach capacity, growth depends on increasing spend per guest. That’s where hospitality becomes critical.

Crushyard intentionally positions itself as more than a sports facility. Competitive pickleball players may come for the courts, but the business is designed around keeping guests onsite longer through elevated food, drinks, social spaces, and service. This mirrors the broader evolution happening across eatertainment. The operators winning today are not simply renting activity time. They are building hospitality ecosystems around those activities.

That means:

• Higher quality food programs
• Flexible service models
• Better bar experiences
• Integrated event programming
• Comfortable social gathering spaces
• Frictionless ordering and payment systems

The goal is simple: increase dwell time and create more opportunities for spending. And importantly, Crushyard recognized that food quality matters more than many operators assume. “There’s so many entertainment facilities that are having bad food,” De La Torre said during the interview.

That may sound obvious, but it remains one of the biggest operational blind spots in entertainment hospitality. Guests increasingly expect strong food and beverage experiences regardless of the venue category. The old model of frozen appetizers and low-priority kitchens no longer works.

Service Models Must Match the Physical Space

Another major operational insight from the episode involved service model flexibility. Crushyard does not force every location into the same operational structure.

Its Charleston venue uses a counter-service model with guest pickup and food runners. Orlando evolved toward full in-court hospitality service with servers visiting courts directly. Nashville is expanding further into elevated service experiences. The key takeaway is that service design should follow venue design.

Too many operators attempt to force operational consistency at the expense of guest experience. Instead, Crushyard adapts hospitality based on:

• Court spacing
• Lounge layout
• Guest flow
• Venue size
• Social gathering behavior
• Staffing efficiency

For large-format entertainment venues, operational flexibility is often more important than strict standardization. Technology also plays a major role here. The integration between reservation systems, point of sale platforms, events software, and guest management tools becomes increasingly important as venues scale.

Crushyard discussed using integrated systems for court reservations, events, and food and beverage operations — allowing the guest experience to feel seamless rather than fragmented. That connected operational approach is becoming a defining characteristic of modern eatertainment businesses.

Franchising Only Works If the Operations Actually Work

Perhaps the most telling part of the conversation was Crushyard’s approach to franchising. The company is actively expanding through franchise partnerships, but not because it has already achieved massive national brand recognition.

Instead, franchise interest appears driven largely by operational credibility. Operators see a model that works. That distinction matters.

In hospitality and entertainment, franchising often fails when brands attempt to scale before operational systems are truly proven. Crushyard’s approach appears rooted in refining the operational playbook first:

• Real estate strategy
• Hospitality standards
• Service models
• Technology stack
• Food and beverage profitability
• Event programming
• Guest experience design

Only after proving those systems does expansion become sustainable. For aspiring operators, that may be the biggest lesson of all. The future of eatertainment is not simply about building courts, attractions, or activities. It is about building scalable hospitality businesses around them. And the operators who understand that distinction will likely define the next generation of social gaming and entertainment venues.

‍